Abstract
Poor reproducibility within and across studies arising from lack of knowledge regarding the performance of extracellular RNA (exRNA) isolation methods has hindered progress in the exRNA field. A systematic comparison of 10 exRNA isolation methods across 5 biofluids revealed marked differences in the complexity and reproducibility of the resulting small RNA-seq profiles. The relative efficiency with which each method accessed different exRNA carrier subclasses was determined by estimating the proportions of extracellular vesicle (EV)-, ribonucleoprotein (RNP)-, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-specific miRNA signatures in each profile. An interactive web-based application (miRDaR) was developed to help investigators select the optimal exRNA isolation method for their studies. miRDar provides comparative statistics for all expressed miRNAs or a selected subset of miRNAs in the desired biofluid for each exRNA isolation method and returns a ranked list of exRNA isolation methods prioritized by complexity, expression level, and reproducibility. These results will improve reproducibility and stimulate further progress in exRNA biomarker development. A systematic comparison of 10 extracellular RNA isolation methods across 5 biofluids will aid researchers in selecting optimal approaches for individual studies with the overall goal of enhancing reliability and reproducibility for a rapidly growing field.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 446-462.e16 |
Journal | Cell |
Volume | 177 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 4 Apr 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- extracellular RNA
- extracellular vesicles
- lipoprotein
- ribonucleoprotein