TY - JOUR
T1 - Slow injection of local anaesthetic will decrease pain during dorsal penile nerve block
AU - Serour, F.
AU - Mandelberg, A.
AU - Mori, J.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate whether a very slow injection of local anaesthetics during dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision causes less pain than a more rapid injection. Methods: In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study, 75 patients aged 15 to 53 yr (mean±SD=22±8.4 yr) were randomized into two groups. A solution of 2% lidocaine, 1 mg·kg-1, and 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5 mg·kg-1 without epinephrine to a maximum dose of 10 ml was injected using either a very slow rate (injection time 100 to 150 s, Group A) or a faster rate (injection time 40 to 80 s, Group B). Patients were questioned regarding pain by a physician who was blinded to the mode of therapy. Pain was rated as 1) mild (negligible), 2) moderate (non-negligible, but easily endurable), 3) intense (but endurable) and 4) total refusal to continue. Results: A significant pain score difference was found between Groups A and B (median=1 vs. 2, P=0.0006) as well as a significant correlation between pain score and the rate of infiltration (r(s)= -0.394, P<0.0001). Conclusions: Slow injection is an important factor in reducing pain during penile block.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate whether a very slow injection of local anaesthetics during dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision causes less pain than a more rapid injection. Methods: In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study, 75 patients aged 15 to 53 yr (mean±SD=22±8.4 yr) were randomized into two groups. A solution of 2% lidocaine, 1 mg·kg-1, and 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5 mg·kg-1 without epinephrine to a maximum dose of 10 ml was injected using either a very slow rate (injection time 100 to 150 s, Group A) or a faster rate (injection time 40 to 80 s, Group B). Patients were questioned regarding pain by a physician who was blinded to the mode of therapy. Pain was rated as 1) mild (negligible), 2) moderate (non-negligible, but easily endurable), 3) intense (but endurable) and 4) total refusal to continue. Results: A significant pain score difference was found between Groups A and B (median=1 vs. 2, P=0.0006) as well as a significant correlation between pain score and the rate of infiltration (r(s)= -0.394, P<0.0001). Conclusions: Slow injection is an important factor in reducing pain during penile block.
KW - Injection, rate
KW - Local anesthetic
KW - Pain
KW - Penile block
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031692068&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05351.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05351.x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 9773136
AN - SCOPUS:0031692068
VL - 42
SP - 926
EP - 928
JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
SN - 0001-5172
IS - 8
ER -