Sino–American relations and the ‘new cold war’: A useful analogy for the Middle East?

Brandon Friedman*, Ori Sela

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This article examines the value of the ‘Cold War’ analogy – which has become a commonly used shorthand to describe the Sino–American rivalry – for understanding the effects of the current great power competition in the Middle East. Instead of thinking in terms of the zero-sum logic of the Cold War, we are using the Cold War history in the Middle East as a heuristic device to sharpen our understanding of today's dilemmas. In other words, we are arguing for the benefits of thinking with the analogy rather than adopting it as a kind of conceptual framework for decision-making. Thinking with the analogy can help us identify how and why the Sino–American rivalry is shaping the Middle East's political and security context. After examining the merits of the analogy, we propose three ‘lessons’ from the Cold War history that can help us comprehend the potential effects of the Middle East on the Sino–American rivalry: Middle East actors can intensify the great power rivalry; Middle East conflicts may force reluctant regional actors to choose a side in the great power rivalry; and, lastly, Middle East energy resources flow in line with the producers' interests, not just the great powers' interests.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-57
Number of pages12
JournalGlobal Policy
Issue numberS1
StatePublished - Feb 2023


Dive into the research topics of 'Sino–American relations and the ‘new cold war’: A useful analogy for the Middle East?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this