Significance of ultrasound and gallium scanning in detecting intraabdominal abscesses

M. Graif, S. T. Zwas, A. Manor, C. Dosorez, S. Strauss, L. Zelikowski, Y. Itzchak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The diagnostic value of ultrasound was compared to that of gallium scan in 36 patients with clinically suspected intraabdominal abscesses. Both modalities reached an accuracy of 91.6%. The gallium scan was found to be more sensitive (93.3%) than ultrasound (86.6%), while the specificity rate of ultrasound (95.2%) was superior to that of the gallium scan (90.4%). It is suggested that, in the acutely ill patient, ultrasound should be the method of choice, whereas in the nonacute patient, either method may be used. A positive ultrasound examination and a negative gallium scan can be considered conclusive, whereas a negative ultrasound study or a positive gallium scan needs the complimentary support of the other modality in order to reach a definite conclusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)789-792
Number of pages4
JournalIsrael Journal of Medical Sciences
Volume18
Issue number7
StatePublished - 1982

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Significance of ultrasound and gallium scanning in detecting intraabdominal abscesses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this