Should we offer in vitro fertilization to couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss?

Michal Kirshenbaum, Raoul Orvieto

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

In clinical practice, empirical treatments are often offered to couples with recurrent pregnancy loss, including in vitro fertilization. Given that most patients with recurrent pregnancy loss are fertile, the scientific rationale of in vitro fertilization for these couple is debatable. This review will discuss the potential benefits of using in vitro fertilization in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss, such as shortening the time to conceive, optimizing the timing of conception, improving gamete and embryo quality, endometrial receptivity and the use of “adds-on”. At present, there is not enough evidence to justify IVF as a treatment option in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2001
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume8
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2019

Keywords

  • Adds-on
  • ART
  • IVF
  • Outcome
  • Repeated pregnancy loss

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should we offer in vitro fertilization to couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this