TY - JOUR
T1 - Shock Wave Lithoripsy with the Dornier MFL 5000 Lithotriptor Using an External Fixed Rate Signal
AU - Lingeman, James E.
AU - Newman, Daniel M.
AU - Siegel, Yoram I.
AU - Eichhorn, Thomas
AU - Parr, Kirk
PY - 1995/9
Y1 - 1995/9
N2 - Purpose: We examine the effects of fixed rate shock wave administration on the cardiac rhythm and treatment efficacy of a tubless lithotriptor (Dornier MFL 5000* * Dornier Medical Systems, Marietta, Georgia. ). A secondary goal was to examine the treatment efficacy of fixed shock were administration compared to R wave triggered lithotripsy. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study Holter monitoring was used before, during and after nonR wave triggered shock wave lithotripsy. Results: An increase in premature ventricular contractions was noted during shock wave lithotripsy. However, there were no episodes of significant ventricular ectopia, ventricular tachycardia, asystole or heart block as a result of nonR wave triggered shock wave administration. NonR wave gated shock wave lithotripsy expedited patient treatment (mean treatment time 46 plus/minus 21 minutes), minimized the use of sedation during treatment and produced results similar to R wave gated shock wave lithotripsy with the MFL 5000 lithotriptor. Conclusions: With adequate precautions, fixed rate shock wave administration would appear to be a reasonable option to treat urolithiasis with the MFL 5000 lithotriptor as with other newer lithotriptors.
AB - Purpose: We examine the effects of fixed rate shock wave administration on the cardiac rhythm and treatment efficacy of a tubless lithotriptor (Dornier MFL 5000* * Dornier Medical Systems, Marietta, Georgia. ). A secondary goal was to examine the treatment efficacy of fixed shock were administration compared to R wave triggered lithotripsy. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study Holter monitoring was used before, during and after nonR wave triggered shock wave lithotripsy. Results: An increase in premature ventricular contractions was noted during shock wave lithotripsy. However, there were no episodes of significant ventricular ectopia, ventricular tachycardia, asystole or heart block as a result of nonR wave triggered shock wave administration. NonR wave gated shock wave lithotripsy expedited patient treatment (mean treatment time 46 plus/minus 21 minutes), minimized the use of sedation during treatment and produced results similar to R wave gated shock wave lithotripsy with the MFL 5000 lithotriptor. Conclusions: With adequate precautions, fixed rate shock wave administration would appear to be a reasonable option to treat urolithiasis with the MFL 5000 lithotriptor as with other newer lithotriptors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029086254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66941-6
DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66941-6
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 7543613
AN - SCOPUS:0029086254
SN - 0022-5347
VL - 154
SP - 951
EP - 954
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
IS - 3
ER -