TY - JOUR
T1 - Shear modulus--measurement methodology with application to light-cured resin composites.
AU - Brosh, T.
AU - Pilo, R.
AU - Arcan, M.
PY - 1996/1
Y1 - 1996/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to test a novel methodology for shear modulus determination of light-cured resin composites. METHODS: Using a butterfly-shaped specimen, a special loading device was able to apply pure uniform shear stress on a significant region of the specimen. Validation of the method was proven by photoelastic experiments. Shear modulus was directly obtained through shear stress-strain curve where the strains were measured by a shear strain gauge rosette. The composite materials analyzed were one microfill (Silux Plus, 3M Dental Products) and four hybrids (Brilliant, Coltene; Herculite XRV, Kerr; Z-100, 3M Dental Products; Graft LC, GC). An analysis of variance was used to evaluate the G modulus (p<0.01). RESULTS: Modulus values varied between 2.54-8.01 GPa. The microfilled material presented the lowest value, and Graft LC presented the highest value. A statistically significant difference was found between all materials (p<0.01). SIGNIFICANCE: The described methodology can also be applied to other restorative materials, as well as to adhesion strength measurements.
AB - OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to test a novel methodology for shear modulus determination of light-cured resin composites. METHODS: Using a butterfly-shaped specimen, a special loading device was able to apply pure uniform shear stress on a significant region of the specimen. Validation of the method was proven by photoelastic experiments. Shear modulus was directly obtained through shear stress-strain curve where the strains were measured by a shear strain gauge rosette. The composite materials analyzed were one microfill (Silux Plus, 3M Dental Products) and four hybrids (Brilliant, Coltene; Herculite XRV, Kerr; Z-100, 3M Dental Products; Graft LC, GC). An analysis of variance was used to evaluate the G modulus (p<0.01). RESULTS: Modulus values varied between 2.54-8.01 GPa. The microfilled material presented the lowest value, and Graft LC presented the highest value. A statistically significant difference was found between all materials (p<0.01). SIGNIFICANCE: The described methodology can also be applied to other restorative materials, as well as to adhesion strength measurements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029685453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80064-9
DO - 10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80064-9
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0029685453
SN - 0109-5641
VL - 12
SP - 52
EP - 57
JO - Dental Materials
JF - Dental Materials
IS - 1
ER -