TY - JOUR
T1 - Sex, gender, and retinoblastoma
T2 - analysis of 4351 patients from 153 countries
AU - On behalf of the Global Retinoblastoma Study Group
AU - Fabian, Ido Didi
AU - Khetan, Vikas
AU - Stacey, Andrew W.
AU - Allen Foster, Foster
AU - Ademola-Popoola, Dupe S.
AU - Berry, Jesse L.
AU - Cassoux, Nathalie
AU - Chantada, Guillermo L.
AU - Hessissen, Laila
AU - Kaliki, Swathi
AU - Kivelä, Tero T.
AU - Luna-Fineman, Sandra
AU - Munier, Francis L.
AU - Reddy, M. Ashwin
AU - Rojanaporn, Duangnate
AU - Blum, Sharon
AU - Sherief, Sadik T.
AU - Staffieri, Sandra E.
AU - Theophile, Tuyisabe
AU - Waddell, Keith
AU - Ji, Xunda
AU - Astbury, Nicholas J.
AU - Bascaran, Covadonga
AU - Burton, Matthew
AU - Zondervan, Marcia
AU - Bowman, Richard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Objective: To investigate in a large global sample of patients with retinoblastoma whether sex predilection exists for this childhood eye cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis including 4351 treatment-naive retinoblastoma patients from 153 countries who presented to 278 treatment centers across the world in 2017. The sex ratio (male/female) in the sample was compared to the sex ratio at birth by means of a two-sided proportions test at global level, country economic grouping, continent, and for selected countries. Results: For the entire sample, the mean retinoblastoma sex ratio, 1.20, was higher than the weighted global sex ratio at birth, 1.07 (p < 0.001). Analysis at economic grouping, continent, and country-level demonstrated differences in the sex ratio in the sample compared to the ratio at birth in lower-middle-income countries (n = 1940), 1.23 vs. 1.07 (p = 0.019); Asia (n = 2276), 1.28 vs. 1.06 (p < 0.001); and India (n = 558), 1.52 vs. 1.11 (p = 0.008). Sensitivity analysis, excluding data from India, showed that differences remained significant for the remaining sample (χ2 = 6.925, corrected p = 0.025) and for Asia (χ2 = 5.084, corrected p = 0.036). Excluding data from Asia, differences for the remaining sample were nonsignificant (χ2 = 2.205, p = 0.14). Conclusions: No proof of sex predilection in retinoblastoma was found in the present study, which is estimated to include over half of new retinoblastoma patients worldwide in 2017. A high male to female ratio in Asian countries, India in specific, which may have had an impact on global-level analysis, is likely due to gender discrimination in access to care in these countries, rather than a biological difference between sexes.
AB - Objective: To investigate in a large global sample of patients with retinoblastoma whether sex predilection exists for this childhood eye cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis including 4351 treatment-naive retinoblastoma patients from 153 countries who presented to 278 treatment centers across the world in 2017. The sex ratio (male/female) in the sample was compared to the sex ratio at birth by means of a two-sided proportions test at global level, country economic grouping, continent, and for selected countries. Results: For the entire sample, the mean retinoblastoma sex ratio, 1.20, was higher than the weighted global sex ratio at birth, 1.07 (p < 0.001). Analysis at economic grouping, continent, and country-level demonstrated differences in the sex ratio in the sample compared to the ratio at birth in lower-middle-income countries (n = 1940), 1.23 vs. 1.07 (p = 0.019); Asia (n = 2276), 1.28 vs. 1.06 (p < 0.001); and India (n = 558), 1.52 vs. 1.11 (p = 0.008). Sensitivity analysis, excluding data from India, showed that differences remained significant for the remaining sample (χ2 = 6.925, corrected p = 0.025) and for Asia (χ2 = 5.084, corrected p = 0.036). Excluding data from Asia, differences for the remaining sample were nonsignificant (χ2 = 2.205, p = 0.14). Conclusions: No proof of sex predilection in retinoblastoma was found in the present study, which is estimated to include over half of new retinoblastoma patients worldwide in 2017. A high male to female ratio in Asian countries, India in specific, which may have had an impact on global-level analysis, is likely due to gender discrimination in access to care in these countries, rather than a biological difference between sexes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110743992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41433-021-01675-y
DO - 10.1038/s41433-021-01675-y
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34272514
AN - SCOPUS:85110743992
SN - 0950-222X
VL - 36
SP - 1571
EP - 1577
JO - Eye (Basingstoke)
JF - Eye (Basingstoke)
IS - 8
ER -