Settlement in Samaria: the ethical dimension

Tamar Meisels*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This essay presents the interests of settlers and settler nations in a new and favourable light, with reference to the Jewish settlements in Samaria in particular. It sets out two lines of argument supporting the inclusion of the Jewish settlement blocs in Samaria into the State of Israel. It argues that taking existing national settlements into account as a major factor in marking boundaries has both distinctly liberal foundations (in John Locke's Second Treatise) and liberal-national appeal. The paper also considers historical reasons for supporting the Zionist settlement project from the start, and within Samaria in particular. Finally, it addresses the complicated and controversial issue of settlement in disputed territories. Ultimately I suggest that Israel has a particularly strong case for entitlement to the territories to which it lays claim, though these interests must compete with countervailing considerations and may not always prevail.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-330
Number of pages18
JournalIsrael Affairs
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Jul 2015

Keywords

  • John Locke
  • Judea and Samaria
  • historical right
  • settlement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Settlement in Samaria: the ethical dimension'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this