TY - JOUR
T1 - Semiautomated MRI-Based Method for Orbital Volume and Contour Analysis
AU - Smadar, Lital
AU - Arazi, Mattan
AU - Greenberg, Gahl
AU - Haviv, Limor
AU - Benifla, Or
AU - Zabatani, Amit
AU - Fabian, Ina
AU - Dagan, Mayan
AU - Gutovitz, Joel M.
AU - Ben Simon, Guy J.
AU - Landau-Prat, Daphna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/9/1
Y1 - 2024/9/1
N2 - Purpose: The architecture of the orbital cavity is intricate, and precise measurement of its growth is essential for managing ocular and orbital pathologies. Most methods for those measurements are by CT imaging, although MRI for soft tissue assessment is indicated in many cases, specifically pediatric patients. This study introduces a novel semiautomated MRI-based approach for depicting orbital shape and dimensions. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Participants: Patients with at least 1 normal orbit who underwent both CT and MRI imaging at a single center from 2015 to 2023. Methods: Orbital dimensions included volume, horizontal and vertical lengths, and depth. These were determined by manual segmentation followed by 3-dimensional image processing software. Main Outcome Measures: Differences in orbital measurements between MRI and CT scans. Results: Thirty-one patients (mean age 47.7 ± 23.8 years, 21 [67.7%]) females, were included. The mean differences in delta values between orbital measurements on CT versus MRI were: volume 0.03 ± 2.01 ml, horizontal length 0.53 ± 2.12 mm, vertical length, 0.36 ± 2.53 mm, and depth 0.97 ± 3.90 mm. The CT and. MRI orbital measurements were strongly correlated: volume (r = 0.92, p < 0.001), horizontal length (r = 0.65, p < 0.001), vertical length (r = 0.57, p = 0.001), and depth (r = 0.46, p = 0.009). The mean values of all measurements were similar on the paired-samples t test: p = 0.9 for volume (30.86 ± 5.04 ml on CT and 30.88 ± 4.92 ml on MRI), p = 0.2 for horizontal length, p = 0.4 for vertical length, and p = 0.2 for depth. Conclusions: We present an innovative semiautomated method capable of calculating orbital volume and demonstrating orbital contour by MRI validated against the gold standard CT-based measurements. This method can serve as a valuable tool for evaluating diverse orbital processes.
AB - Purpose: The architecture of the orbital cavity is intricate, and precise measurement of its growth is essential for managing ocular and orbital pathologies. Most methods for those measurements are by CT imaging, although MRI for soft tissue assessment is indicated in many cases, specifically pediatric patients. This study introduces a novel semiautomated MRI-based approach for depicting orbital shape and dimensions. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Participants: Patients with at least 1 normal orbit who underwent both CT and MRI imaging at a single center from 2015 to 2023. Methods: Orbital dimensions included volume, horizontal and vertical lengths, and depth. These were determined by manual segmentation followed by 3-dimensional image processing software. Main Outcome Measures: Differences in orbital measurements between MRI and CT scans. Results: Thirty-one patients (mean age 47.7 ± 23.8 years, 21 [67.7%]) females, were included. The mean differences in delta values between orbital measurements on CT versus MRI were: volume 0.03 ± 2.01 ml, horizontal length 0.53 ± 2.12 mm, vertical length, 0.36 ± 2.53 mm, and depth 0.97 ± 3.90 mm. The CT and. MRI orbital measurements were strongly correlated: volume (r = 0.92, p < 0.001), horizontal length (r = 0.65, p < 0.001), vertical length (r = 0.57, p = 0.001), and depth (r = 0.46, p = 0.009). The mean values of all measurements were similar on the paired-samples t test: p = 0.9 for volume (30.86 ± 5.04 ml on CT and 30.88 ± 4.92 ml on MRI), p = 0.2 for horizontal length, p = 0.4 for vertical length, and p = 0.2 for depth. Conclusions: We present an innovative semiautomated method capable of calculating orbital volume and demonstrating orbital contour by MRI validated against the gold standard CT-based measurements. This method can serve as a valuable tool for evaluating diverse orbital processes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203476034&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002656
DO - 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002656
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 38534059
AN - SCOPUS:85203476034
SN - 0740-9303
VL - 40
SP - 569
EP - 575
JO - Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
JF - Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
IS - 5
ER -