Self, social and monopoly optimization in observable queues

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Naor?s [8] celebrated paper studies customer decisions in an observable M/M/1 queue where customers utility from joining the system is is a linear decreasing function of the joined position in queue. Naor derives the optimal threshold strategies for the individual, social planner and monopoly. The optimal threshold imposed by a monopoly is not greater than the socially optimal threshold, which is not greater than the individual?s threshold. Studies show that this triangular relation holds in a more general setup where the utility function is not necessarily linear. Many of these extensions share common features. We point out conditions that imply the aforementioned result, and apply them to a new model motivated by order-driven markets. In the new model, customers choose between joining and balking when they might be forced to abandon the system before service completion, and the expected value of joining depends on the service completion probability, which is not linear in the observed queue size.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools, VALUETOOLS 2017
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages214-220
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)9781450363464
DOIs
StatePublished - 5 Dec 2017
Event11th EAI International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools, VALUETOOLS 2017 - Venice, Italy
Duration: 5 Dec 20177 Dec 2017

Publication series

NameACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Conference

Conference11th EAI International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools, VALUETOOLS 2017
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityVenice
Period5/12/177/12/17

Keywords

  • Observable Queues
  • Rational Queueing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self, social and monopoly optimization in observable queues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this