TY - JOUR
T1 - Selection of patients before and after anticancer treatment for ovarian cryopreservation.
AU - Abir, Ronit
AU - Ben-Haroush, Avi
AU - Felz, Carmela
AU - Okon, Elimelch
AU - Raanani, Hila
AU - Orvieto, Raoul
AU - Nitke, Shmuel
AU - Fisch, Benjamin
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was partially supported by grants from Tel Aviv University (R.O., R.A.) and Israel Cancer Association (B.F., R.A.).
PY - 2008/4
Y1 - 2008/4
N2 - BACKGROUND: Although ovarian cryopreservation in patients with cancer should ideally be performed before the initiation of therapy, cryopreservation from such patients often becomes an option only later. The justification for the procedure needs to be elucidated. METHODS: Eighteen cancer patients before chemotherapy and 23 others after chemotherapy participated in the study. Freshly dissected ovarian samples were prepared for light microscopy to demonstrate follicular numbers and apoptosis, transmission electron microscopy to enhance intracellular changes, and staining with fluorescent markers (calcein AM, rhodamin 123 and ethidium homodimer) to test for viability. RESULTS: High numbers of preantral follicles were detected in ovaries of patients < or =20 years. No antral follicles were detected. All the follicles were viable and not apoptotic. Deterioration in follicular quality was observed after chemotherapy, manifested mainly as an increase in abnormal granulosa cell nuclei (P < 0.05-0.0001) and in oocyte vacuolization (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study stresses the importance of prechemotherapy ovarian cryopreservation. However, the large number of viable, non-apoptotic follicles in ovaries of younger patients (age < or = 20 years) indicates that ovarian cryopreservation might be considered after treatment in this age group. Further studies of ovarian samples from women aged 20-30 years are needed to determine the exact age margin wherein postchemotherapy ovarian cryopreservation can be suggested.
AB - BACKGROUND: Although ovarian cryopreservation in patients with cancer should ideally be performed before the initiation of therapy, cryopreservation from such patients often becomes an option only later. The justification for the procedure needs to be elucidated. METHODS: Eighteen cancer patients before chemotherapy and 23 others after chemotherapy participated in the study. Freshly dissected ovarian samples were prepared for light microscopy to demonstrate follicular numbers and apoptosis, transmission electron microscopy to enhance intracellular changes, and staining with fluorescent markers (calcein AM, rhodamin 123 and ethidium homodimer) to test for viability. RESULTS: High numbers of preantral follicles were detected in ovaries of patients < or =20 years. No antral follicles were detected. All the follicles were viable and not apoptotic. Deterioration in follicular quality was observed after chemotherapy, manifested mainly as an increase in abnormal granulosa cell nuclei (P < 0.05-0.0001) and in oocyte vacuolization (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study stresses the importance of prechemotherapy ovarian cryopreservation. However, the large number of viable, non-apoptotic follicles in ovaries of younger patients (age < or = 20 years) indicates that ovarian cryopreservation might be considered after treatment in this age group. Further studies of ovarian samples from women aged 20-30 years are needed to determine the exact age margin wherein postchemotherapy ovarian cryopreservation can be suggested.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44249116926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/humrep/dem413
DO - 10.1093/humrep/dem413
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:44249116926
SN - 0268-1161
VL - 23
SP - 869
EP - 877
JO - Human Reproduction
JF - Human Reproduction
IS - 4
ER -