Seeing what you want to see: Priors for one's own actions represent exaggerated expectations of success

Noham Wolpe, Daniel M. Wolpert, James B. Rowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

People perceive the consequences of their own actions differently to how they perceive other sensory events. A large body of psychology research has shown that people also consistently overrate their own performance relative to others, yet little is known about how these "illusions of superiority" are normally maintained. Here we examined the visual perception of the sensory consequences of self-generated and observed goal-directed actions. Across a series of visuomotor tasks, we found that the perception of the sensory consequences of one's own actions is more biased toward success relative to the perception of observed actions. Using Bayesian models, we show that this bias could be explained by priors that represent exaggerated predictions of success. The degree of exaggeration of priors was unaffected by learning, but was correlated with individual differences in trait optimism. In contrast, when observing these actions, priors represented more accurate predictions of the actual performance. The results suggest that the brain internally represents optimistic predictions for one's own actions. Such exaggerated predictions bind the sensory consequences of our own actions with our intended goal, explaining how it is that when acting we tend to see what we want to see.

Original languageEnglish
Article number232
JournalFrontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Volume8
Issue numberJUNE
DOIs
StatePublished - 27 Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Action observation
  • Bayesian
  • Goal-directed action
  • Illusions of superiority
  • Sense of agency
  • Sensorimotor prediction
  • Visual perception
  • Voluntary action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Seeing what you want to see: Priors for one's own actions represent exaggerated expectations of success'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this