Seeing the Trees From the Forest: Challenges in Subgroup Analysis-Based Guidelines in Oncology

Ofer Rotem*, Karyn Revital Geiger, Ekaterina Hanovich, Mor Moskovitz, Noga Kurman, Daniel Reinhorn, Idit Peretz, Rinat Yerushalmi, Salomon M. Stemmer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As clinical trials in oncology require substantial efforts, maximizing the insights gained from them by conducting subgroup analyses is often attempted. The goal of these analyses is to identify subgroups of patients who are likely to benefit, as well as the subgroups of patients who are unlikely to benefit from the studied intervention. International guidelines occasionally include or exclude novel medications and technologies for specific subpopulations based on such analyses of pivotal trials without requiring confirmatory trials. This Perspective discusses the importance of providing a complete dataset of clinical information when reporting subgroup analyses and explains why such transparency is key for better clinical interpretation of the results and the appropriate application to clinical care, by providing examples of transparent reporting of clinical studies and examples of incomplete reporting of clinical studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1355256
JournalOncology Reviews
Volume18
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Funding

FundersFunder number
AstraZeneca
Ashfield MedComms
Avital Bareket-Samish
Rabin Medical Center

    Keywords

    • cancer
    • clinical outcomes
    • clinical trial
    • guidelines
    • reporting
    • subanalysis
    • treatment

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Seeing the Trees From the Forest: Challenges in Subgroup Analysis-Based Guidelines in Oncology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this