Securitization climax: Putting the Iranian nuclear project at the top of the Israeli Public Agenda (2009–2012)

Amir Lupovici*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

What happens to a securitized issue over time? In many cases, the issue goes through a process of desecuritization and ceases to be an existential threat. But in some cases, enunciators attempt to further securitize the issue, attracting public attention through dramatic means to bring it to a new climax. The aim of these securitizing actors is to justify taking more intensive exceptional measures than those taken previously in securitizing the same threatening issue. In this paper, I focus on the securitization of the Iranian nuclear project in Israel, which began in the 1990s. Although the issue was successfully securitized at that time, and has been maintained as a securitized issue for years, it reached a new peak during Prime Minister Netanyahu’s second government (2009–2013), particularly in 2012. I suggest that examining this case in developing the concept of securitization climax not only clarifies a number of aspects of politics, threat perception, and insecurity in Israel, but provides a more nuanced view of securitization dynamics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-432
Number of pages20
JournalForeign Policy Analysis
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Securitization climax: Putting the Iranian nuclear project at the top of the Israeli Public Agenda (2009–2012)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this