Salience and Context: Interpretation of Metaphorical and Literal Language by Young Adults Diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome

Rachel Giora*, Oshrat Gazal, Idit Goldstein, Ofer Fein, Argyris Stringaris

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Asperger's Syndrome (AS) involves difficulties in social communication but no delays in language or cognitive development. According to the received view, individuals with AS are biased toward the literal and are insensitive to contextual cues. According to the graded salience hypothesis (Giora, 1997, 2003), participants with AS and controls would be sensitive to both context and degree of salience rather than to degree of nonliterality. Our results show that while individuals with AS generally performed worse than controls, their overall pattern of response was similar to that of controls: both groups performed worse on novel than on familiar expressions, whether literal or metaphorical; both groups benefited from context, which reduced response times and error rates on novel but not on familiar metaphors; both groups rated negative utterances as more metaphoric than their affirmative counterparts. Individuals with AS, then, are sensitive to context and degree of salience and are not biased toward the literal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-54
Number of pages33
JournalMetaphor and Symbol
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Funding

FundersFunder number
Israel Science Foundation652/07
Tel Aviv University

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Salience and Context: Interpretation of Metaphorical and Literal Language by Young Adults Diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this