TY - JOUR
T1 - Robust PI Controller Design Satisfying Sensitivity and Uncertainty Specifications
AU - Yaniv, Oded
AU - Nagurka, Mark
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received April 10, 2003revised May 29, 2003. Recommended by Associate Editor D. E. Miller. The work of M. Nagurka was supported by a Fulbright Scholarship for the 2001–2002 academic year allowing him to pursue this research in the Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics at The Weizmann Institute of Science (Rehovot, Israel).
PY - 2003/11
Y1 - 2003/11
N2 - This note presents a control design method for determining proportional-integral-type controllers satisfying specifications on gain margin, phase margin, and an upper bound on the (complementary) sensitivity for a finite set of plants. The approach can be applied to plants that are stable or unstable, plants given by a model or measured data, and plants of any order, including plants with delays. The algorithm is efficient and fast, and as such can be used in near real-time to determine controller parameters (for online modification of the plant model including its uncertainty and/or the specifications). The method gives an optimal controller for a practical definition of optimality. Furthermore, it enables the graphical portrayal of design tradeoffs in a single plot, highlighting the effects of the gain margin, complementary sensitivity bound, low frequency sensitivity and high frequency sensor noise amplification.
AB - This note presents a control design method for determining proportional-integral-type controllers satisfying specifications on gain margin, phase margin, and an upper bound on the (complementary) sensitivity for a finite set of plants. The approach can be applied to plants that are stable or unstable, plants given by a model or measured data, and plants of any order, including plants with delays. The algorithm is efficient and fast, and as such can be used in near real-time to determine controller parameters (for online modification of the plant model including its uncertainty and/or the specifications). The method gives an optimal controller for a practical definition of optimality. Furthermore, it enables the graphical portrayal of design tradeoffs in a single plot, highlighting the effects of the gain margin, complementary sensitivity bound, low frequency sensitivity and high frequency sensor noise amplification.
KW - Design
KW - Gain and phase margin
KW - Linear systems
KW - Proportional-integral (PI) control
KW - Robustness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344395572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TAC.2003.819646
DO - 10.1109/TAC.2003.819646
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0344395572
SN - 0018-9286
VL - 48
SP - 2069
EP - 2072
JO - IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
JF - IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
IS - 11
ER -