Robotic radical hysterectomy: Comparison of outcomes and cost

Darron Halliday, Susie Lau, Zvi Vaknin, Claire Deland, Mark Levental, Elizabeth McNamara, Raphael Gotlieb, Rebecca Kaufer, Jeffrey How, Eva Cohen, Walter H. Gotlieb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Operative and peri-operative outcomes, complications, and cost for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with negative sentinel nodes have been compared for robotics and laparotomy. Forty patients underwent radical hysterectomy with/out bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, for early-stage cervical cancer. All cases were performed by one of two surgeons, at a single institution (16 robotic, 24 laparotomy). The data for the robotic group were collected prospectively and compared with data for a historic cohort who underwent laparotomy. The data included demographics and peri-operative variables including operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node count, hospital stay, and complications. Additionally, real direct hospital cost was compared for both modalities. Patients undergoing robotic radical hysterectomy experienced longer operative time than the laparotomy cohort (351 min vs. 283 min P = 0.0001). Estimated blood loss was significantly lower for the robotic cohort than for the laparotomy cohort (106 ml vs. 546 ml P < 0.0001). The minor complication rate was lower in the robotic cohort than for laparotomy (19% vs. 63% P = 0.003). Average hospital stay for the robotic patients was significantly shorter than for those undergoing laparotomy (1.9 days versus 7.2 days, P < 0.0001). Lymph node retrieval did not differ between the two groups (robotic 15 nodes, laparotomy 13 nodes). The total average peri-operative costs for radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy completed via laparotomy was CAN $11,764 ± 6,790, and for robotic assistance 8,183 ± 1,089 (P = 0.002). When amortization of the robot was included, there remained a trend in favor of the robotic approach, but it did not reach statistical significance. Whereas robotics takes longer to perform than traditional laparotomy, it provides the patient with a shorter hospital stay, less need for pain medications, and reduced peri-operative morbidity. In addition real average hospital costs tend to be lower.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-216
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Robotic Surgery
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes


  • Cervical cancer
  • Complications, economical considerations
  • Cost
  • Laparotomy
  • Radical hysterectomy
  • Robotics


Dive into the research topics of 'Robotic radical hysterectomy: Comparison of outcomes and cost'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this