Robotic-Assisted hysterectomy: Patient selection and perspectives

Noam Smorgick*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Minimally invasive hysterectomy via the laparoscopic or vaginal approach is beneficial to patients when compared with laparotomy, but has not been offered in the past to all women because of the technical difficulties and the long learning curve required for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications may allow for a shorter learning curve but does not offer clear advantages over conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy in terms of surgical outcomes. In addition, robotic hysterectomy is invariably associated with increased costs. Nevertheless, this surgical approach has been widely adopted by gynecologic surgeons. The aim of this review is to describe specific indications and patients who may benefit from robotic-assisted hysterectomy. These include hysterectomy for benign conditions in cases with high surgical complexity (such as pelvic adhesive disease and endometriosis), hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for treatment of endometrial carcinoma, and obese patients. In the future, additional evidence regarding the benefits of single-site robotic hysterectomy may further modify the indications for robotic-assisted hysterectomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-161
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Women's Health
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - 23 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • Minimally invasive hysterectomy
  • Robotic-assisted hysterectomy
  • Single-site laparoscopy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Robotic-Assisted hysterectomy: Patient selection and perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this