Risk stratification in brugada syndrome: Clinical characteristics, electrocardiographic parameters and auxiliary testing

Arnon Adler, Sami Viskin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Management of patients with Brugada syndrome is dependent on risk stratification. Patients with only a drug-induced Brugada pattern and without any other risk markers are at very low risk and are usually followed without treatment. Survivors of a cardiac arrest are at the highest risk of cardiac events and are usually managed with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Patients with history of syncope are at intermediate risk. Their risk stratification is dependent, first and foremost, on the presumed cause of loss of consciousness (arrhythmic or non-arrhythmic). However, most Brugada patients are asymptomatic. Their risk is low but not trivial. Therefore, most efforts for risk stratification focus on this group. Unfortunately, a widely-accepted risk stratification strategy is unavailable. Most controversy revolves around the issue of programmed electrical stimulation and its effectiveness in predicting cardiac events. In this chapter the current data regarding risk stratification of Brugada syndrome will be discussed and an approach to patients suggested.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJ Wave Syndromes
Subtitle of host publicationBrugada and Early Repolarization Syndromes
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages173-191
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9783319315782
ISBN (Print)9783319315768
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Brugada syndrome
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Electrophysiological study
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Primary prevention
  • Programmed electrical stimulation
  • Secondary prevention
  • Sudden cardiac death

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk stratification in brugada syndrome: Clinical characteristics, electrocardiographic parameters and auxiliary testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this