TY - JOUR
T1 - Reward disrupts reactivated human skill memory
AU - Dayan, Eran
AU - Laor-Maayany, Rony
AU - Censor, Nitzan
N1 - Funding Information:
Eran Dayan was supported by the intramural program of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Nitzan Censor was supported by the I-CORE program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and The ISF (grant 51/11).
PY - 2016/6/16
Y1 - 2016/6/16
N2 - Accumulating evidence across species and memory domains shows that when an existing memory is reactivated, it becomes susceptible to modifications. However, the potential role of reward signals in these mechanisms underlying human memory dynamics is unknown. Leaning on a wealth of findings on the role of reward in reinforcing memory, we tested the impact of reinforcing a skill memory trace with monetary reward following memory reactivation, on strengthening of the memory trace. Reinforcing reactivated memories did not strengthen the memory, but rather led to disruption of the memory trace, breaking down the link between memory reactivation and subsequent memory strength. Statistical modeling further revealed a strong mediating role for memory reactivation in linking between memory encoding and subsequent memory strength only when the memory was replayed without reinforcement. We suggest that, rather than reinforcing the existing memory trace, reward creates a competing memory trace, impairing expression of the original reward-free memory. This mechanism sheds light on the processes underlying skill acquisition, having wide translational implications.
AB - Accumulating evidence across species and memory domains shows that when an existing memory is reactivated, it becomes susceptible to modifications. However, the potential role of reward signals in these mechanisms underlying human memory dynamics is unknown. Leaning on a wealth of findings on the role of reward in reinforcing memory, we tested the impact of reinforcing a skill memory trace with monetary reward following memory reactivation, on strengthening of the memory trace. Reinforcing reactivated memories did not strengthen the memory, but rather led to disruption of the memory trace, breaking down the link between memory reactivation and subsequent memory strength. Statistical modeling further revealed a strong mediating role for memory reactivation in linking between memory encoding and subsequent memory strength only when the memory was replayed without reinforcement. We suggest that, rather than reinforcing the existing memory trace, reward creates a competing memory trace, impairing expression of the original reward-free memory. This mechanism sheds light on the processes underlying skill acquisition, having wide translational implications.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84975494723
U2 - 10.1038/srep28270
DO - 10.1038/srep28270
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 27306380
AN - SCOPUS:84975494723
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 6
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
M1 - 28270
ER -