TY - JOUR
T1 - Research note
T2 - Neighborhoods as territorial units: The case of tel aviv-jaffa
AU - Schnell, Izhak
AU - Benjamini, Yoav
AU - Pash, Dov
PY - 2005/2/1
Y1 - 2005/2/1
N2 - This paper suggests a GIS-based methodology for the investigation of the extent to which the inhabitants of a representative sample of city residents perceives itself as living in socially constituted neighborhood territories. We ask residents about the relevancy of the neighborhood as a social unit and to delineate their neighborhood boundaries. We then define these delineations as polygons in GIS, measuring the tendency of neighbors to define merging territorial bases for their neighborhoods. Three possible patterns are identified: (1) lack of perceived boundaries resulting from the irrelevancy of the neighborhood, (2) personal senses of localities that do not merge into communal territories by immediate neighbors—in this case we conclude that residents experience some sense of locality but they do not share any common sense of neighborhood—and (3) the tendency of residents' delineations to merge with those of their neighbors demonstrating, by thus, the social constitution of communal sense of neighborhood. We conclude that in most of the city the neighborhood is marginally relevant with only several areas, located in the outer ring of the city, presenting a coherent territorial sense of neighborhood.
AB - This paper suggests a GIS-based methodology for the investigation of the extent to which the inhabitants of a representative sample of city residents perceives itself as living in socially constituted neighborhood territories. We ask residents about the relevancy of the neighborhood as a social unit and to delineate their neighborhood boundaries. We then define these delineations as polygons in GIS, measuring the tendency of neighbors to define merging territorial bases for their neighborhoods. Three possible patterns are identified: (1) lack of perceived boundaries resulting from the irrelevancy of the neighborhood, (2) personal senses of localities that do not merge into communal territories by immediate neighbors—in this case we conclude that residents experience some sense of locality but they do not share any common sense of neighborhood—and (3) the tendency of residents' delineations to merge with those of their neighbors demonstrating, by thus, the social constitution of communal sense of neighborhood. We conclude that in most of the city the neighborhood is marginally relevant with only several areas, located in the outer ring of the city, presenting a coherent territorial sense of neighborhood.
KW - Sense of locality
KW - Sense of neighborhood
KW - Socially constituted sense of neighborhood
KW - Territorial base of neighborhood
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24644458917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2747/0272-3638.26.1.84
DO - 10.2747/0272-3638.26.1.84
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:24644458917
SN - 0272-3638
VL - 26
SP - 84
EP - 95
JO - Urban Geography
JF - Urban Geography
IS - 1
ER -