Reporting infections in clinical trials of patients with haematological malignancies

N. Tau*, L. Shargian-Alon, S. Reich, M. Paul, A. Gafter-Gvili, D. Shepshelovich, D. Yahav

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Infections are common among patients treated for haematological malignancies and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The completeness of reporting infectious complications in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing treatments for haematological malignancies is unknown. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the completeness of reporting infectious complications in RCTs assessing treatments for haematological malignancies. Data source: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed database. Study eligibility criteria and participants: All primary published phase II/III RCTs between September 2016 and September 2018 evaluating treatments for haematological malignancies in adult patients were included. Intervention: Reporting infectious complications. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the completeness of reporting. Study characteristics and data concerning reporting of infectious complications were collected by two independent reviewers. Quality of reporting was assessed using a modification of the CONSORT extension checklist for harms, including 15 items. Results: One-hundred and seven RCTs were included. Most trials (97; 91%) provided some report on infections. Approximately half reported on each of pneumonia, sepsis and neutropenic fever; 12 trials (11%) reported on fungal infections. Only nine trials (8%) listed infections by type of pathogen (i.e. bacterial, fungal or viral) and 48 (45%) by source/type of infection (i.e. pneumonia, urinary tract infection, etc.). Most trials did not address infections in their title, abstract, introduction or discussion. Median number of items of the CONSORT modification reported was 7 points, (interquartile range (IQR) 6–9) for all included trials, with lower median for 34 acute leukaemia trials (median 6, IQR 5–8). Conclusions: Most trials evaluating treatment for haematological malignancies provide some data relating to infectious complications. The reports are mostly incomplete and rarely provided in a structured presentation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1494-1500
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Microbiology and Infection
Volume25
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2019

Keywords

  • CONSORT
  • CONSORT harms
  • Haematological malignancies
  • Randomized controlled trials

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reporting infections in clinical trials of patients with haematological malignancies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this