Reply to "comment on 'Past of a quantum particle' "

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Misinterpretation in the preceding Comment of my recent analysis of the past of a photon is corrected. There is nothing in this analysis which is "contrary to the usual quantum expectations" but, nevertheless, it does provide "further understanding and interpretation of the system considered." In particular, it indicates that the common sense argument used in the Comment should be abandoned.

Original languageEnglish
Article number046103
JournalPhysical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
Volume88
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 29 Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to "comment on 'Past of a quantum particle' "'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this