Replies to Comesaña and Yablo

Assaf Sharon, Levi Spectre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There are few indulgences academics can crave more than to have their work considered and addressed by leading researchers in their field. We have been fortunate to have two outstanding philosophers from whose work we have learned a great deal give ours their thoughtful attention. Grappling with Stephen Yablo’s, and Juan Comesaña’s comments and criticisms has helped us gain a better understanding of our ideas as well as their shortcomings. We are extremely grateful to them for the attentiveness and seriousness with which they have considered our arguments and to philosophical studies for giving us this opportunity. Given the substantive difference between the two response papers, there is not much beyond sincere gratitude that we can covey to them jointly. We will therefore address them in turn.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1073-1090
Number of pages18
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume174
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2017

Keywords

  • Aboutness
  • Closure
  • Evidence
  • Knowledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Replies to Comesaña and Yablo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this