Renal oncocytoma-are there sufficient grounds to consider surveillance following prenephrectomy histologic diagnosis

Miki Haifler, Laurian Copel, Judith Sandbank, Erez Lang, Orit Raz, Dan Leibovici, Arie Lindner, Amnon Zisman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Oncocytoma is a benign neoplasm of the kidney and comprises about 12% of all renal masses. A definitive preoperative diagnosis of oncocytoma is currently technically not feasible and its practical implication is controversial. Objectives: To analyze the current status of preoperative diagnostic tools for oncocytoma, study the different occurrences of oncocytoma-renal cell carcinoma (RCC) coexistence, including the phenomenon of true hybrid tumors, and investigate the rare reports on the natural history of unresected oncocytoma. Materials and methods: A PubMed search was performed using the following key word: oncocytoma, renal cell carcinoma, natural history, electron microscopy, and cytogenetics. Medline articles and abstracts prior to August 2009 were reviewed. Results and conclusions: At the moment, preoperative renal mass biopsy is the only way for prenephrectomy histologic diagnosis of oncocytoma. However, it is expected that some of these biopsies, although suggestive for oncocytoma, will suspect chromophobe RCC. In all the English literature, the number of true ipsilateral synchronous hybrid oncocytoma-RCC tumors is extremely low in comparison with the "pure" oncocytomas being resected worldwide. There is almost no data on the natural history of oncocytoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)362-368
Number of pages7
JournalUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Keywords

  • Biopsy
  • Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma
  • Oncocytoma
  • Preoperative diagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Renal oncocytoma-are there sufficient grounds to consider surveillance following prenephrectomy histologic diagnosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this