Reliability of Neck Mass Point-of-Care Ultrasound by Pediatric Emergency Physicians

Nir Friedman, Felicia Tseng, Ranko Savic, Mamadou Diallo, Kate Fathi, Lianne Mclean, Mark O. Tessaro*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Neck masses are a common reason for presentations to the pediatric emergency department (PED). We sought to determine the agreement and time difference between point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) imaging by pediatric emergency physicians compared to radiology department imaging for children with neck masses in the PED. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients aged 0 to 18 years presenting to our tertiary PED who received both POCUS by a pediatric emergency physician and radiology department imaging. Charts were reviewed for POCUS diagnoses, final diagnoses, and imaging time metrics. Results: Seventy-five patients met the study criteria. In 58 of 75 cases there was agreement between the POCUS diagnosis and final diagnosis (κ = 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.6–0.83). There was agreement in 25 of the 28 cases in which POCUS examinations were performed by PED physicians with fellowship training in POCUS (κ = 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–1.00). The results for POCUS were generated in a median of 115 minutes (interquartile range, 68–185 minutes) before radiology department imaging results. Conclusions: Point-of-care ultrasound imaging by pediatric emergency physicians for children with neck masses is a promising new POCUS application that may be able to save time in the PED.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2893-2900
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume38
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • neck mass
  • pediatric emergency medicine
  • point-of-care ultrasound

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of Neck Mass Point-of-Care Ultrasound by Pediatric Emergency Physicians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this