Regaining control? The political impact of policy responses to refugee crises

Omer Solodoch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In response to the political turmoil surrounding the recent refugee crisis, destination countries swiftly implemented new immigration and asylum policies. Are such countercrisis policies effective in mitigating political instability by reducing antiimmigrant backlash and support for radical-right parties? The present study exploits two surveys that were coincidentally fielded during significant policy changes, sampling respondents right before and immediately after the change. I employ a regression discontinuity design to identify the short-term causal effect of the policy change on public opinion within a narrow window of the sampling period. The findings show that both Swedish border controls and the EU-Turkey agreement significantly reduced public opposition to immigration in Sweden and Germany, respectively. In Germany, support for the AfD party also decreased following the new policy. Public opinion time trends suggest that the policy effects were short lived in Sweden but durable in Germany. These effects are similar across different levels of proximity to the border and are accompanied by increasing political trust and a sense of government control over the situation. The findings have implications for understanding the impact of border controls on international public opinion, as well as for assessing the electoral effect of policy responses to global refugee crises.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)735-768
Number of pages34
JournalInternational Organization
Volume75
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 6 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Border controls
  • Immigration policy
  • Public backlash
  • Refugee crises

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regaining control? The political impact of policy responses to refugee crises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this