TY - JOUR
T1 - Reframing High-Quality Mentoring
T2 - Between Teacher Mentoring and Visions of Teaching as a Profession
AU - Carmi, Tal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Visions of teacher professionalism may shape common conceptualizations of high-quality mentoring, sometimes distortedly. Nevertheless, this relationship is often unnoticed, and studies rarely analyze mentor–teachers’ work according to their interrelating visions. This multiple case study aimed at this literature gap. It examined the goals that accomplished mentor-teachers promoted and their practices and found four mentoring styles that characterized these mentors. After, it interrogated how the mentoring styles interrelated with three distinct visions of teacher professionalism (teachers as intellectuals, craftspeople, or artists). Findings challenge the idea that mentor-teachers’ work can be evaluated as either advancing or degrading teacher professionalism. The study questions this framing of mentoring literature and suggests that a bipolar logic could mislead us to forsake essential aspects of mentoring, for instance, ones associated with apprenticeship relations. The study concludes by offering to replace the bipolar logic with a more balanced consideration of the different aspects of teacher mentoring.
AB - Visions of teacher professionalism may shape common conceptualizations of high-quality mentoring, sometimes distortedly. Nevertheless, this relationship is often unnoticed, and studies rarely analyze mentor–teachers’ work according to their interrelating visions. This multiple case study aimed at this literature gap. It examined the goals that accomplished mentor-teachers promoted and their practices and found four mentoring styles that characterized these mentors. After, it interrogated how the mentoring styles interrelated with three distinct visions of teacher professionalism (teachers as intellectuals, craftspeople, or artists). Findings challenge the idea that mentor-teachers’ work can be evaluated as either advancing or degrading teacher professionalism. The study questions this framing of mentoring literature and suggests that a bipolar logic could mislead us to forsake essential aspects of mentoring, for instance, ones associated with apprenticeship relations. The study concludes by offering to replace the bipolar logic with a more balanced consideration of the different aspects of teacher mentoring.
KW - co-teachers
KW - teacher mentoring
KW - teacher preparation
KW - teacher professionalism
KW - teacher professionalization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172770765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00224871231200276
DO - 10.1177/00224871231200276
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85172770765
SN - 0022-4871
JO - Journal of Teacher Education
JF - Journal of Teacher Education
ER -