TY - JOUR
T1 - Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus–response rules
T2 - evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials
AU - Meiran, Nachshon
AU - Pereg, Maayan
AU - Kessler, Yoav
AU - Cole, Michael W.
AU - Braver, Todd S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Psychonomic Society, Inc.
PY - 2015/6/22
Y1 - 2015/6/22
N2 - Previous behavioral and electrophysiological evidence has suggested that the instructions for a new choice task are processed even when they are not currently required, indicating intention-based reflexivity. Yet these demonstrations were found in experiments in which participants were set to execute a response (go). In the present experiment, we asked whether intention-based reflexivity would also be observed under unfavorable conditions in which participants were set not to respond (no-go). In each miniblock of our paradigm, participants received instructions for a task in which two new stimuli were mapped to right/left keys. Immediately after the instructions, a no-go phase began, which was immediately followed by a go phase. We found a significant stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potential in the first no-go trial, indicating reflexive operation of the new instructions. These results show that representing instructions in working memory provides sufficient conditions for stimuli to launch task processing, proceeding all the way until motor response-specific brain activation, which takes place even under unfavorable, no-go conditions.
AB - Previous behavioral and electrophysiological evidence has suggested that the instructions for a new choice task are processed even when they are not currently required, indicating intention-based reflexivity. Yet these demonstrations were found in experiments in which participants were set to execute a response (go). In the present experiment, we asked whether intention-based reflexivity would also be observed under unfavorable conditions in which participants were set not to respond (no-go). In each miniblock of our paradigm, participants received instructions for a task in which two new stimuli were mapped to right/left keys. Immediately after the instructions, a no-go phase began, which was immediately followed by a go phase. We found a significant stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potential in the first no-go trial, indicating reflexive operation of the new instructions. These results show that representing instructions in working memory provides sufficient conditions for stimuli to launch task processing, proceeding all the way until motor response-specific brain activation, which takes place even under unfavorable, no-go conditions.
KW - Automaticity
KW - Instructions
KW - Intention-based reflexivity
KW - LRP
KW - Working memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928525902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13415-014-0321-8
DO - 10.3758/s13415-014-0321-8
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 25216992
AN - SCOPUS:84928525902
SN - 1530-7026
VL - 15
SP - 365
EP - 373
JO - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
JF - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
IS - 2
M1 - 9
ER -