Reference values for strong ion difference-A novel tool for fetal metabolic assessment

Yoni Cohen, Adi Nimord, Jessica Ascher-Landsberg, Michael J. Kupferminc, Joseph B. Lessing, Ariel Many*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this pilot study was to establish reference values for strong ion difference (SID) in umbilical cord blood and investigate the feasibility of evaluating fetal metabolism according to the comprehensive approach to acid-base abnormalities, based on Stewart's physiochemical theory. Study design: A prospective observational study. Women who underwent an elective cesarean section at term (n = 40) were compared to women who completed a normal spontaneous delivery at term (n = 40). The primary outcome was the establishment of normal values for SID in the umbilical cord vein. We also compared acid-base variables in the umbilical vein between the groups. Results: The apparent SID in the umbilical vein was 34.61 ± 3.92 mequiv./L after normal delivery and 35.98 ± 2.56 mequiv./L after elective cesarean section (the effective SID is 37.43 ± 1.93 and 38.29 ± 2.38 mequiv./L, respectively). The pH values were similar in both groups, but the pCO 2 was significantly higher and the plasma principal weak acids (albumin and phosphate) were significantly lower after cesarean sections. Conclusions: SID enables a comprehensive approach to acid-base abnormalities in the neonate, making it a potential additional tool for evaluating fetal acid-base status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-148
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume145
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Acidosis
  • Blood gas
  • Fetal metabolism
  • Strong ion difference
  • Umbilical cord

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reference values for strong ion difference-A novel tool for fetal metabolic assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this