TY - JOUR
T1 - Reduced postoperative chronic pain after tension-free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable sutures
T2 - A single-blind randomized clinical trial
AU - Jeroukhimov, Igor
AU - Wiser, Itay
AU - Karasic, Evgeny
AU - Nesterenko, Vladimir
AU - Poluksht, Natan
AU - Lavy, Ron
AU - Halevy, Ariel
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - Background Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair occurs in 16% to 62% of patients. The underlying mechanism probably involves sensory nerve damage and abnormal healing that might be influenced by the materials chosen for the procedure. We hypothesize that nonabsorbable sutures used for mesh fixation to the surrounding tissues are associated with higher rates of chronic groin pain after surgery. Study Design We conducted a single-blind randomized clinical trial to compare the effect of absorbable braided sutures (Vycril; Ethicon) and nonabsorbable monofilament sutures (Prolene; Ethicon) used in inguinal hernia repair on the rate of chronic pain. We assessed chronic pain using a 4-point verbal-rank scale during a 1-year postoperative follow-up period. Results Study groups included 100 patients in each group. No age, sex, or hernia-side differences were observed between the study groups. Chronic pain rate after surgery was higher in the nonabsorbable monofilament suture group compared with the absorbable braided suture group (37 vs 26 patients; p = 0.056). Time to pain disappearance was longer in the nonabsorbable monofilament suture vs the absorbable braided suture group (115.3 days; 95% CI, 88-142.7 vs 77.4 days; 95% CI, 54.3-100.3; p = 0.038, respectively). A 1-year age increment reduces the risk for chronic pain occurrence by 2.2% (odds ratio = 0.978%; 95% CI, 0.961-0.995; p = 0.013). The use of nonabsorbable sutures increases the risk for chronic pain in 94.9% compared with absorbable sutures (odds ratio = 1.949; 95% CI, 1.039-3.658; p = 0.038). Conclusions Nonabsorbable suture use in inguinal hernia repair is associated with a higher rate of chronic pain and a longer time to pain disappearance as compared with absorbable sutures.
AB - Background Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair occurs in 16% to 62% of patients. The underlying mechanism probably involves sensory nerve damage and abnormal healing that might be influenced by the materials chosen for the procedure. We hypothesize that nonabsorbable sutures used for mesh fixation to the surrounding tissues are associated with higher rates of chronic groin pain after surgery. Study Design We conducted a single-blind randomized clinical trial to compare the effect of absorbable braided sutures (Vycril; Ethicon) and nonabsorbable monofilament sutures (Prolene; Ethicon) used in inguinal hernia repair on the rate of chronic pain. We assessed chronic pain using a 4-point verbal-rank scale during a 1-year postoperative follow-up period. Results Study groups included 100 patients in each group. No age, sex, or hernia-side differences were observed between the study groups. Chronic pain rate after surgery was higher in the nonabsorbable monofilament suture group compared with the absorbable braided suture group (37 vs 26 patients; p = 0.056). Time to pain disappearance was longer in the nonabsorbable monofilament suture vs the absorbable braided suture group (115.3 days; 95% CI, 88-142.7 vs 77.4 days; 95% CI, 54.3-100.3; p = 0.038, respectively). A 1-year age increment reduces the risk for chronic pain occurrence by 2.2% (odds ratio = 0.978%; 95% CI, 0.961-0.995; p = 0.013). The use of nonabsorbable sutures increases the risk for chronic pain in 94.9% compared with absorbable sutures (odds ratio = 1.949; 95% CI, 1.039-3.658; p = 0.038). Conclusions Nonabsorbable suture use in inguinal hernia repair is associated with a higher rate of chronic pain and a longer time to pain disappearance as compared with absorbable sutures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890799653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.010
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 24210149
AN - SCOPUS:84890799653
SN - 1072-7515
VL - 218
SP - 102
EP - 107
JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
IS - 1
ER -