TY - JOUR
T1 - Reduced fetal movements at term, low-risk pregnancies
T2 - is it associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes? Ten years of experience from a single tertiary center
AU - Levy, Michal
AU - Kovo, Michal
AU - Barda, Giulia
AU - Gluck, Ohad
AU - Koren, Liron
AU - Bar, Jacob
AU - Weiner, Eran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Objective: We aimed to assess the outcomes of low-risk pregnancies complicated by isolated reduced fetal movements (RFM) at term. Study design: The study population were patients at term, with singleton, low-risk, pregnancies who presented to our obstetric-triage and delivered during the subsequent 2 weeks. The study group included patients with an isolated complaint of RFM (RFM group). The control group included patients without history of RFM (control group). The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Severe and mild composites of adverse neonatal outcomes were defined. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent association with adverse neonatal outcomes. Results: Among the 13,338 pregnant women, 2762 (20.7%) were included in the RFM group and 10,576 (79.3%) in the control group. The RFM group had higher rates of nulliparity (p < 0.001), and smoking (p < 0.001). At admission, the RFM group had higher rates of IUFD (p < 0.001). The RFM group had higher rates of Cesarean delivery due to non-reassuring fetal monitor (p < 0.001), and mild adverse neonatal outcomes (p = 0.001). RFM was associated with mild adverse outcome independent of background confounders (aOR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–2.6, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients presented with isolated RFM at term had higher rates of IUFD at presentation and significant adverse outcomes at delivery.
AB - Objective: We aimed to assess the outcomes of low-risk pregnancies complicated by isolated reduced fetal movements (RFM) at term. Study design: The study population were patients at term, with singleton, low-risk, pregnancies who presented to our obstetric-triage and delivered during the subsequent 2 weeks. The study group included patients with an isolated complaint of RFM (RFM group). The control group included patients without history of RFM (control group). The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Severe and mild composites of adverse neonatal outcomes were defined. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent association with adverse neonatal outcomes. Results: Among the 13,338 pregnant women, 2762 (20.7%) were included in the RFM group and 10,576 (79.3%) in the control group. The RFM group had higher rates of nulliparity (p < 0.001), and smoking (p < 0.001). At admission, the RFM group had higher rates of IUFD (p < 0.001). The RFM group had higher rates of Cesarean delivery due to non-reassuring fetal monitor (p < 0.001), and mild adverse neonatal outcomes (p = 0.001). RFM was associated with mild adverse outcome independent of background confounders (aOR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–2.6, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients presented with isolated RFM at term had higher rates of IUFD at presentation and significant adverse outcomes at delivery.
KW - Delivery outcome
KW - Low-risk pregnancies
KW - Reduced fetal movements
KW - Term
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082561562&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00404-020-05516-3
DO - 10.1007/s00404-020-05516-3
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 32198623
AN - SCOPUS:85082561562
SN - 0932-0067
VL - 301
SP - 987
EP - 993
JO - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - 4
ER -