Recurrent sublethal warming reduces embryonic survival, inhibits juvenile growth, and alters species distribution projections under climate change

Michael A. Carlo*, Eric A. Riddell, Ofir Levy, Michael W. Sears

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

The capacity to tolerate climate change often varies across ontogeny in organisms with complex life cycles. Recently developed species distribution models incorporate traits across life stages; however, these life-cycle models primarily evaluate effects of lethal change. Here, we examine impacts of recurrent sublethal warming on development and survival in ecological projections of climate change. We reared lizard embryos in the laboratory under temperature cycles that simulated contemporary conditions and warming scenarios. We also artificially warmed natural nests to mimic laboratory treatments. In both cases, recurrent sublethal warming decreased embryonic survival and hatchling sizes. Incorporating survivorship results into a mechanistic species distribution model reduced annual survival by up to 24% compared to models that did not incorporate sublethal warming. Contrary to models without sublethal effects, our model suggests that modest increases in developmental temperatures influence species ranges due to effects on survivorship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-116
Number of pages13
JournalEcology Letters
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
National Science Foundation1246875
Clemson University

    Keywords

    • Climate change
    • distribution
    • embryo
    • growth
    • ontogeny
    • sublethal
    • survival
    • temperature

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Recurrent sublethal warming reduces embryonic survival, inhibits juvenile growth, and alters species distribution projections under climate change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this