TY - JOUR
T1 - Recovery rate after acute acoustic trauma
T2 - a case series and meta-analysis
AU - Welber, Shir
AU - Oron, Yahav
AU - Handzel, Ophir
AU - Abu-Eta, Rani
AU - Muhanna, Nidal
AU - Shilo, Shahaf
AU - Ungar, Omer J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objective: Steroids given systemically, locally, or both are the mainstay of treatment for acute acoustic trauma (AAT). The overall recovery rate (full, partial, and none) is undetermined. Study design: Original case series and systematic literature review. Setting: Case series of a tertiary referral center and a systematic literature review. Methods: Cases of AAT between 2012 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed for demographics, acoustic trauma characteristics, treatment modality and delay and prognosis. This case series was added to the series identified by a systematic literature review. This review included “Medline” via “PubMed”, “EMBASE”, and “Google scholar”. All series were pooled for meta-analysis defining prognosis following steroidal treatment for AAT patients. Results: The pooled analyses included 662 ears, out of which 250 underwent complete recovery of hearing (overall proportion = 0.2809, 95%confidence interval [CI] = 0.1611–0.4178). Any recovery was recorded for 477 ears (overall proportion = 0.7185, 95% CI = 0.5671–0.8493) and no recovery was documented for 185 ears (overall proportion = 0.2815, 95% CI = 0.1507–0.4329). Conclusion: The rate of overall recovery for AAT is around 70%, and around 30% for full recovery when steroids are initiated within the first 2 weeks following the insult. Level of evidence: 3.
AB - Objective: Steroids given systemically, locally, or both are the mainstay of treatment for acute acoustic trauma (AAT). The overall recovery rate (full, partial, and none) is undetermined. Study design: Original case series and systematic literature review. Setting: Case series of a tertiary referral center and a systematic literature review. Methods: Cases of AAT between 2012 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed for demographics, acoustic trauma characteristics, treatment modality and delay and prognosis. This case series was added to the series identified by a systematic literature review. This review included “Medline” via “PubMed”, “EMBASE”, and “Google scholar”. All series were pooled for meta-analysis defining prognosis following steroidal treatment for AAT patients. Results: The pooled analyses included 662 ears, out of which 250 underwent complete recovery of hearing (overall proportion = 0.2809, 95%confidence interval [CI] = 0.1611–0.4178). Any recovery was recorded for 477 ears (overall proportion = 0.7185, 95% CI = 0.5671–0.8493) and no recovery was documented for 185 ears (overall proportion = 0.2815, 95% CI = 0.1507–0.4329). Conclusion: The rate of overall recovery for AAT is around 70%, and around 30% for full recovery when steroids are initiated within the first 2 weeks following the insult. Level of evidence: 3.
KW - Acute acoustic trauma
KW - Noise-induced hearing loss
KW - Phonal trauma
KW - Sensorineural hearing loss
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198834698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00405-024-08847-y
DO - 10.1007/s00405-024-08847-y
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 39017996
AN - SCOPUS:85198834698
SN - 0937-4477
JO - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
JF - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
ER -