Reconsidering the relation between serum homocysteine and red blood cell distribution width: a cross-sectional study of a large cohort

Ili Margalit*, Eytan Cohen, Elad Goldberg, Ilan Krause

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: In a recent small sample study, red blood cell distribution width (RDW) was suggested as a predictor of homocysteine levels. The current study was aimed to reexamine this association in a large scale sample. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of healthy adults, conducted at Rabin Medical Center, during 2000–2014. Data were retrieved from the medical charts and a logistic regression controlling for interfering factors was carried out. Sensitivity analysis was implemented by exclusion of individuals with anaemia. Results: Five thousand, five hundred fifty-four healthy individuals were included. Mean serum homocysteine level was 10.10 (SD 2.72) μmol/L. 34.4% of the study population had a homocysteine level higher than the upper limit of normal (10.8 μmol/L). Homocysteine showed no association with RDW (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.97–1.03), but increased with age (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.04–1.06) and decreased with a rise in haemoglobin (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.71–0.83), and in the mean corpuscular volume (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.85–0.88). Exclusion of individuals with anaemia did not reveal an association between homocysteine and RDW but found a somewhat smaller association between haemoglobin and RDW [OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.91]. Conclusions: In our large scale sample we did not find an association between RDW and serum homocysteine.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-486
Number of pages4
JournalBiomarkers
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Jul 2018

Keywords

  • Anaemia
  • homocysteine
  • red blood cell distribution width

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reconsidering the relation between serum homocysteine and red blood cell distribution width: a cross-sectional study of a large cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this