TY - JOUR
T1 - Reboxetine
T2 - A randomized controlled open-label study in children and adolescents with major depression
AU - Toren, Paz
AU - Goldstein, Guy
AU - Ben-Amitay, Galit
AU - Ben-Sheetrit, Joseph
AU - Slone, Michelle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Mediafarm Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Objective: This study is the first to examine the efficacy of reboxetine in the treatment of children and adolescents with depression. Method: In this open-label randomized controlled study, 14 youths (aged 9-18 years) with major depression received either reboxetine (4mg/day) or fluoxetine (20mg/day) in a 2:1 ratio. Primary outcome measures included the Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R), the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I), and the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI). Response was defined by either a 20% reduction in CDRS-R or a 2-point reduction in CGI-I. Results: Improvement in depression with reboxetine was noted within 4 weeks. A further non-significant improvement was noted after 8 weeks, proceeding through week 12. Response was achieved by six subjects (66.7%) by week 4 and eight subjects (88.9%) by week 12. Both reboxetine and fluoxetine were safe with tolerable adverse effects, although several non-significant differences in efficacy and overall frequency of side effects were found in favor of fluoxetine. Conclusions: Reboxetine was safe and effective in treating youth with major depressive disorder. Further studies with long-term follow up are needed in order to replicate our findings and determine the relative efficacy of reboxetine compared to fluoxetine.
AB - Objective: This study is the first to examine the efficacy of reboxetine in the treatment of children and adolescents with depression. Method: In this open-label randomized controlled study, 14 youths (aged 9-18 years) with major depression received either reboxetine (4mg/day) or fluoxetine (20mg/day) in a 2:1 ratio. Primary outcome measures included the Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R), the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I), and the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI). Response was defined by either a 20% reduction in CDRS-R or a 2-point reduction in CGI-I. Results: Improvement in depression with reboxetine was noted within 4 weeks. A further non-significant improvement was noted after 8 weeks, proceeding through week 12. Response was achieved by six subjects (66.7%) by week 4 and eight subjects (88.9%) by week 12. Both reboxetine and fluoxetine were safe with tolerable adverse effects, although several non-significant differences in efficacy and overall frequency of side effects were found in favor of fluoxetine. Conclusions: Reboxetine was safe and effective in treating youth with major depressive disorder. Further studies with long-term follow up are needed in order to replicate our findings and determine the relative efficacy of reboxetine compared to fluoxetine.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070821419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85070821419
SN - 0333-7308
VL - 56
SP - 26
EP - 33
JO - Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences
JF - Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences
IS - 1
ER -