Abstract
Experimental psychologists and economists construct an individual or interactive decision situation in the laboratory. They find non-negligible differences between the observed behavior of participants and the theoretically implied behavior. We refer here to the expected utility theory and to strategic equilibrium in non-cooperative game theory. We comment on the question whether rationality, implies these theoretical behaviors and whether the non-negligible differences as above imply that participants in experiments are irrational. We also comment on the relation between rationality and consistency, in particular in situations of uncertainty.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 289-294 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali |
Issue number | 3 |
State | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- Bayesian
- Behavioral Economics
- Biases
- Decision making
- Uncertainty