Randomized Trial of Two Induction Therapy Regimens for High-Risk Neuroblastoma: HR-NBL1.5 International Society of Pediatric Oncology European Neuroblastoma Group Study

Alberto Garaventa, Ulrike Poetschger, Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Roberto Luksch, Victoria Castel, Martin Elliott, Shifra Ash, Godfrey C.F. Chan, Geneviève Laureys, Maja Beck-Popovic, Kim Vettenranta, Walentyna Balwierz, Henrik Schroeder, Cormac Owens, Maja Cesen, Vassilios Papadakis, Toby Trahair, Gudrun Schleiermacher, Peter Ambros, Stefania SorrentinoAndrew D.J. Pearson, Ruth Lydia Ladenstein*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE Induction therapy is a critical component of the therapy of high-risk neuroblastoma. We aimed to assess if the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) N5 induction regimen (MSKCC-N5) would improve metastatic complete response (mCR) rate and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) compared with rapid COJEC (rCOJEC; cisplatin [C], vincristine [O], carboplatin [J], etoposide [E], and cyclophosphamide [C]). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (age 1-20 years) with stage 4 neuroblastoma or stage 4/4s aged, 1 year with MYCN amplification were eligible for random assignment to rCOJEC or MSKCC-N5. Random assignment was stratified according to national group and metastatic sites. Following induction, therapy comprised primary tumor resection, high-dose busulfan and melphalan, radiotherapy to the primary tumor site, and isotretinoin with ch14.18/CHO (dinutuximab beta) antibody with or without interleukin-2 immunotherapy. The primary end points were mCR rate and 3-year EFS. RESULTS A total of six hundred thirty patients were randomly assigned to receive rCOJEC (n 5 313) or MSKCCN5 (n 5 317). Median age at diagnosis was 3.2 years (range, 1 month to 20 years), and 16 were younger than 1 year of age with MYCN amplification. mCR rate following rCOJEC induction (32%, 86/272 evaluable patients) was not significantly different from 35% (99/281) with MSKCC-N5 (P 5 .368), and 3-year EFS was 44% 6 3% for rCOJEC compared with 47% 6 3% for MSKCC-N5 (P 5 .527). Three-year overall survival was 60% 6 3% for rCOJEC compared with 65% 6 3% for MSKCC-N5 (P 5 .379). Toxic death rates with both regimens were 1%. However, nonhematologic CTC grade 3 and 4 toxicities were higher with MSKCC-N5: 68% (193/283) versus 48% (129/268) (P, .001); infection 35% versus 25% (P 5 .011); stomatitis 25% versus 3% (P, .001); nausea and vomiting 17% versus 7% (P, .001); and diarrhea 7% versus 3% (P 5 .011). CONCLUSION No difference in outcome was observed between rCOJEC and MSKCC-N5; however, acute toxicity was less with rCOJEC, and therefore rCOJEC is the preferred induction regimen for International Society of Pediatric Oncology European Neuroblastoma Group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2552-2563
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume39
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Aug 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized Trial of Two Induction Therapy Regimens for High-Risk Neuroblastoma: HR-NBL1.5 International Society of Pediatric Oncology European Neuroblastoma Group Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this