TY - JOUR
T1 - Race and psychological distress
T2 - The South African stress and health study
AU - Jackson, Pamela Braboy
AU - Williams, David R.
AU - Stein, Dan J.
AU - Herman, Allen
AU - Williams, Stacey L.
AU - Redmond, Deidre L.
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - We analyze data from the South African Stress and Health Study, a nationally representative in-person psychiatric epidemiologic survey of 4,351 adults conducted as part of the World Mental Health Survey Initiative between January 2002 and June 2004. All blacks (Africans, Coloreds, and Indians) initially report higher levels of non-specific distress and anger/hostility than whites. Access to socioeconomic resources helps explain differences in non-specific distress between Coloreds and whites and Indians and whites. However, only when social stressors are considered do we find few differences in psychological distress (i.e., non-specific distress and anger/hostility) between Africans and whites. In addition, self-esteem and mastery have independent effects on non-specific distress and anger/hostility, but differences between Coloreds and whites in feelings of anger/hostility are not completely explained by self-esteem and mastery. The findings contribute to the international body of work on social stress theory, challenge underlying assumptions of the minority status perspective, and raise a series of questions regarding mental health disparities among South Africans.
AB - We analyze data from the South African Stress and Health Study, a nationally representative in-person psychiatric epidemiologic survey of 4,351 adults conducted as part of the World Mental Health Survey Initiative between January 2002 and June 2004. All blacks (Africans, Coloreds, and Indians) initially report higher levels of non-specific distress and anger/hostility than whites. Access to socioeconomic resources helps explain differences in non-specific distress between Coloreds and whites and Indians and whites. However, only when social stressors are considered do we find few differences in psychological distress (i.e., non-specific distress and anger/hostility) between Africans and whites. In addition, self-esteem and mastery have independent effects on non-specific distress and anger/hostility, but differences between Coloreds and whites in feelings of anger/hostility are not completely explained by self-esteem and mastery. The findings contribute to the international body of work on social stress theory, challenge underlying assumptions of the minority status perspective, and raise a series of questions regarding mental health disparities among South Africans.
KW - life events
KW - psychological distress
KW - race
KW - South Africa
KW - stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650409364&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0022146510386795
DO - 10.1177/0022146510386795
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 21131621
AN - SCOPUS:78650409364
SN - 0022-1465
VL - 51
SP - 458
EP - 477
JO - Journal of Health and Social Behavior
JF - Journal of Health and Social Behavior
IS - 4
ER -