TY - JOUR
T1 - Questionnaire-based study showed that neonatal chest radiographs could be reliably interpreted using the WhatsApp messaging application
AU - Gross, Itai
AU - Langer, Yshia
AU - Pasternak, Yehonatan
AU - Abu Ahmad, Wiessam
AU - Eventov-Friedman, Smadar
AU - Koplewitz, Benjamin Z.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2018 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Aim: We surveyed whether clinicians used the WhatsApp messaging application to view neonatal chest radiographs and asked a sub-sample to compare them with computer screen viewings. Methods: The study was conducted at three university-affiliated medical centres in Israel from June–December 2016. Questionnaires on using smartphones for professional purposes were completed by 68/71 paediatric residents and 20/28 neonatologists. In addition, 11 neonatologists viewed 20 chest radiographs on a computer screen followed by a smartphone and 10 viewed the same radiographs in the opposite order, separated by a washout period of 2 months. After another 2 months, five from each group viewed the same radiographs on a computer screen. Different interpretations between viewing modes were assessed. Results: Most respondents used WhatsApp to send chest radiographs for consultation: 82% of the paediatric residents and 80% of the neonatologists. The mean number of inconsistencies in diagnosis was 3.7/20 between two computer views and 2.9/20 between computer and smartphone views (p = 0.88) and the disease severity means were 3.7/20 and 2.85/20, respectively (p = 0.94). Neonatologists using WhatsApp only determined umbilical line placement in 80% of cases. Conclusion: WhatsApp was reliable for preliminary interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs, but caution was needed when assessing umbilical lines.
AB - Aim: We surveyed whether clinicians used the WhatsApp messaging application to view neonatal chest radiographs and asked a sub-sample to compare them with computer screen viewings. Methods: The study was conducted at three university-affiliated medical centres in Israel from June–December 2016. Questionnaires on using smartphones for professional purposes were completed by 68/71 paediatric residents and 20/28 neonatologists. In addition, 11 neonatologists viewed 20 chest radiographs on a computer screen followed by a smartphone and 10 viewed the same radiographs in the opposite order, separated by a washout period of 2 months. After another 2 months, five from each group viewed the same radiographs on a computer screen. Different interpretations between viewing modes were assessed. Results: Most respondents used WhatsApp to send chest radiographs for consultation: 82% of the paediatric residents and 80% of the neonatologists. The mean number of inconsistencies in diagnosis was 3.7/20 between two computer views and 2.9/20 between computer and smartphone views (p = 0.88) and the disease severity means were 3.7/20 and 2.85/20, respectively (p = 0.94). Neonatologists using WhatsApp only determined umbilical line placement in 80% of cases. Conclusion: WhatsApp was reliable for preliminary interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs, but caution was needed when assessing umbilical lines.
KW - Chest radiograph
KW - Computer
KW - Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
KW - Smartphone WhatsApp
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058296862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/apa.14444
DO - 10.1111/apa.14444
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 29889988
AN - SCOPUS:85058296862
SN - 0803-5253
VL - 108
SP - 94
EP - 100
JO - Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
JF - Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
IS - 1
ER -