TY - JOUR
T1 - Questioning the utility of round spermatid injections in men with non-obstructive azoospermia
AU - Barda, Shimi
AU - Mano, Roy
AU - Lehavi, Ofer
AU - Kleiman, Sandra E.
AU - Yossepowitch, Ofer
AU - Azem, Foad
AU - Hauser, Ron
AU - Dekalo, Snir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Background: Data on who among the infertile male population may benefit from round spermatid injections (ROSI) are lacking. Objective: To determine the probability of finding round spermatids suitable for ROSI in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) in whom no spermatozoa were retrieved at testicular sperm extraction. Materials and methods: Four-hundred fifty-seven consecutive men with azoospermia underwent testicular sperm extraction. Clinical examination included age, secondary sexual characteristics, testicular size, reproductive hormone estimation, karyotyping, and Y chromosome microdeletion analyses. Histologic examination was performed, and histologic classification was determined by the most advanced spermatogenetic cell identified in the combined histologic and cytologic examination. Results: Of the 457 azoospermic men, 342 were diagnosed with NOA, and 148 (148/342, 43%) had mixed atrophy on histopathology and retrievable spermatozoa. No spermatozoa were found in 194/342 men with NOA (57%). Histopathology diagnosed 145/194 (75%) of them with Sertoli cell only, 45/194 (23%) with spermatocyte maturation arrest, and 4/194 (2%) with spermatid maturation arrest. Conclusions: Histopathologically identified round spermatids without spermatozoa were rare in men with NOA. Only very few of them are likely to reap the benefits of ROSI, thus presenting the need to reconsider its actual clinical value.
AB - Background: Data on who among the infertile male population may benefit from round spermatid injections (ROSI) are lacking. Objective: To determine the probability of finding round spermatids suitable for ROSI in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) in whom no spermatozoa were retrieved at testicular sperm extraction. Materials and methods: Four-hundred fifty-seven consecutive men with azoospermia underwent testicular sperm extraction. Clinical examination included age, secondary sexual characteristics, testicular size, reproductive hormone estimation, karyotyping, and Y chromosome microdeletion analyses. Histologic examination was performed, and histologic classification was determined by the most advanced spermatogenetic cell identified in the combined histologic and cytologic examination. Results: Of the 457 azoospermic men, 342 were diagnosed with NOA, and 148 (148/342, 43%) had mixed atrophy on histopathology and retrievable spermatozoa. No spermatozoa were found in 194/342 men with NOA (57%). Histopathology diagnosed 145/194 (75%) of them with Sertoli cell only, 45/194 (23%) with spermatocyte maturation arrest, and 4/194 (2%) with spermatid maturation arrest. Conclusions: Histopathologically identified round spermatids without spermatozoa were rare in men with NOA. Only very few of them are likely to reap the benefits of ROSI, thus presenting the need to reconsider its actual clinical value.
KW - azoospermia
KW - round spermatid injections
KW - spermatid
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104137492&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/andr.13008
DO - 10.1111/andr.13008
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 33774922
AN - SCOPUS:85104137492
SN - 2047-2919
VL - 9
SP - 1145
EP - 1150
JO - Andrology
JF - Andrology
IS - 4
ER -