TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying the Impact of Selection Bias Caused by Nonparticipation in a Case-Control Study of Mobile Phone Use
AU - Vrijheid, Martine
AU - Richardson, Lesley
AU - Armstrong, Bruce K.
AU - Auvinen, Anssi
AU - Berg, Gabriele
AU - Carroll, Matthew
AU - Chetrit, Angela
AU - Deltour, Isabelle
AU - Feychting, Maria
AU - Giles, Graham g.
AU - Hours, Martine
AU - Iavarone, Ivano
AU - Lagorio, Susanna
AU - Lönn, Stefan
AU - Mcbride, Mary
AU - Parent, Marie Elise
AU - Sadetzki, Siegal
AU - Salminen, Tina
AU - Sanchez, Marie
AU - Schlehofer, Birgitte
AU - Schüz, Joachim
AU - Siemiatycki, Jack
AU - Tynes, Tore
AU - Woodward, Alistair
AU - Yamaguchi, Naohito
AU - Cardis, Elisabeth
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank all dedicated staff at the participating centers, including interviewers and other fieldwork staff, and staff at hospitals and cancer registries who aided case identification. INTERPHONE was funded by the European Fifth Framework Program (contract QLK4-CT-1999901563) and the International Union against Cancer (UICC; the UICC received funds for this purpose from the Mobile Manufacturers' Forum and GSM Association. Provision of funds to the INTERPHONE study investigators via the UICC was governed by agreements that guaranteed the complete scientific independence of INTERPHONE. The terms of these agreements are publicly available at http://www.iarc.fr/ENG/Units/RCAd.html/ ). National funding sources included: Australia: The Cancer Council New South Wales and The Cancer Council Victoria; Canada: The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (project MOP-42525), the Canada Research Chair programme (salary support for Dr. Siemiatycki), the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (salary support for Dr. Parent). New-Zealand: the New Zealand Health Research Council.
PY - 2009/1
Y1 - 2009/1
N2 - Purpose: To quantitatively assess the impact of selection bias caused by nonparticipation in a multinational case-control study of mobile phone use and brain tumor. Methods: Non-response questionnaires (NRQ) were completed by a sub-set of nonparticipants. Selection bias factors were calculated based on the prevalence of mobile phone use reported by nonparticipants with NRQ data, and on scenarios of hypothetical exposure prevalence for other nonparticipants. Results: Regular mobile phone use was reported less frequently by controls and cases who completed the NRQ (controls, 56%; cases, 50%) than by those who completed the full interview (controls, 69%; cases, 66%). This relationship was consistent across study centers, sex, and age groups. Lower education and more recent start of mobile phone use were associated with refusal to participate. Bias factors varied between 0.87 and 0.92 in the most plausible scenarios. Conclusions: Refusal to participate in brain tumor case-control studies seems to be related to less prevalent use of mobile phones, and this could result in a downward bias of around 10% in odds ratios for regular mobile phone use. The use of simple selection bias estimation methods in case-control studies can give important insights into the extent of any bias, even when nonparticipant information is incomplete.
AB - Purpose: To quantitatively assess the impact of selection bias caused by nonparticipation in a multinational case-control study of mobile phone use and brain tumor. Methods: Non-response questionnaires (NRQ) were completed by a sub-set of nonparticipants. Selection bias factors were calculated based on the prevalence of mobile phone use reported by nonparticipants with NRQ data, and on scenarios of hypothetical exposure prevalence for other nonparticipants. Results: Regular mobile phone use was reported less frequently by controls and cases who completed the NRQ (controls, 56%; cases, 50%) than by those who completed the full interview (controls, 69%; cases, 66%). This relationship was consistent across study centers, sex, and age groups. Lower education and more recent start of mobile phone use were associated with refusal to participate. Bias factors varied between 0.87 and 0.92 in the most plausible scenarios. Conclusions: Refusal to participate in brain tumor case-control studies seems to be related to less prevalent use of mobile phones, and this could result in a downward bias of around 10% in odds ratios for regular mobile phone use. The use of simple selection bias estimation methods in case-control studies can give important insights into the extent of any bias, even when nonparticipant information is incomplete.
KW - Brain Neoplasms
KW - Case-Control Studies
KW - Cellular Phones
KW - Epidemiological Methods
KW - Refusal to Participate
KW - Selection Bias
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57049164266&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.006
DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.006
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 19064187
AN - SCOPUS:57049164266
SN - 1047-2797
VL - 19
SP - 33-41.e1
JO - Annals of Epidemiology
JF - Annals of Epidemiology
IS - 1
ER -