Pupil dilation using drops vs gel: A comparative study

E. Moisseiev, D. Loberman, E. Zunz, A. Kesler, A. Loewenstein, J. Mandelblum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PurposeTo compare the efficacy in pupil dilation and degree of discomfort between topical instillation of mydriatic drops and gel.MethodsThe study included 60 patients with no previous ocular history of trauma and surgery. One eye was dilated with two drops (tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 10%), and the other with one drop of gel (tropicamide 0.5%+phenylephrine 5%). Pupil size was measured by a Colvard pupillometer at baseline and 5, 15, 30, and 45 min following instillation. Pain upon instillation was measured by visual analog scale (VAS).ResultsThere was no difference in pupil size at baseline. Use of the gel achieved greater mydriasis than drops (P=0.01), and was also associated with lower pain scores (P=0.003). In diabetic patients, pupil size was smaller at baseline and following instillation of drops and gel. Use of the gel achieved an even greater degree of pupil dilation in this subset of patients than drops (P=0.019).ConclusionsGel formulation achieved significantly greater pupil dilation than drops, despite a lower concentration of phenylephrine, and was also associated with significantly lower patient discomfort. This study is the first report of improved mydriatic efficacy in diabetic patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)815-819
Number of pages5
JournalEye
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 Jun 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pupil dilation using drops vs gel: A comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this