Psychoanalytic criminology, childhood and the democratic self

Michal Shapira*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter concentrates on the little-known work of psychoanalysts in their roles as members of the Institute for the Scientific Treatment of Delinquency (ISTD) in London. In the post-war period, psychoanalytic ideas resonated with those of government officials and courts, and were also taken up in first-person descriptions by many of those deemed criminals. The organization actively sought out expert advisers who were already committed to a psychoanalytic approach to crime. The question of continuity and change in theories of crime and punishment is a complex one; and the degree to which the Second World War transformed psychoanalytic criminology is open to debate. Healthy family dynamics and normal childhood development, they argued, are central to the challenge of cultivating emotionally balanced and mature democratic subjects in an era bedevilled by totalitarianism. In the post-war period, psychoanalytic ideas resonated with those of government officials and courts, and were also taken up in first-person descriptions by many of those deemed criminals.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPsychoanalysis in the Age of Totalitarianism
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages73-86
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781317643180
ISBN (Print)9781138793880
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychoanalytic criminology, childhood and the democratic self'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this