TY - JOUR
T1 - Provision of a DAPT Score to Cardiologists and Extension of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After ACS
T2 - Randomized Substudy of the Prospective Canadian ACS Reflective II Study
AU - Canadian ACS Reflective II Investigators
AU - Arbel, Yaron
AU - Patel, Ashish D.
AU - Goodman, Shaun G.
AU - Tan, Mary K.
AU - Suskin, Neville
AU - McKelvie, Robert S.
AU - Mathew, Andrew L.
AU - Ahmed, Firas
AU - Lutchmedial, Sohrab
AU - Dehghani, Payam
AU - Lavoie, Andrea J.
AU - Huynh, Thao
AU - Lavi, Shahar
AU - Khan, Razi
AU - Yan, Andrew T.
AU - Fordyce, Christopher B.
AU - Heffernan, Michael
AU - Jedrzkiewicz, Sean
AU - Madan, Mina
AU - Ahmed, Shaheeda
AU - Barry, Colin
AU - Dery, Jean Pierre
AU - Bagai, Akshay
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: Extension of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) beyond 1 year after acute coronary syndrome is associated with a reduction in ischemic events but also increased bleeding. The DAPT score identifies individuals likely to derive overall benefit or harm from DAPT extension. We sought to evaluate the impact of providing the DAPT score to treating physicians on the decision to extend DAPT beyond 1 year after non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Methods: Moderate to high-risk non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were enrolled from July 2016 to May 2018 in 13 Canadian hospitals by 52 cardiologists. Participating cardiologists were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive their individual patients’ DAPT scores before the 1-year follow-up visit vs not receiving their patients’ DAPT scores. Rates of DAPT extension were compared among the randomized groups. Results: At 1 year, 370 of the 585 (63.2%) patients discharged on DAPT were receiving DAPT. Among patients on DAPT at 1 year, the median (25th, 75th percentile) DAPT score was 2 (1,3). DAPT was extended beyond 1 year in 36.2% randomly assigned to provision of DAPT score vs 35.7% in the control group (P = 0.93). In the subgroup of patients with DAPT score ≥ 2, DAPT extension was 49.5% in the DAPT score provision arm vs 40.4% in the control arm (P = 0.22); among patients with DAPT score < 2, DAPT termination was 78.6% in the DAPT score provision arm vs 70.6% in the control arm (P = 0.26) (P value for interaction = 0.1). Conclusions: In this exploratory randomized trial, provision of the DAPT score to treating physicians had no impact on the duration of DAPT treatment beyond 1 year.
AB - Background: Extension of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) beyond 1 year after acute coronary syndrome is associated with a reduction in ischemic events but also increased bleeding. The DAPT score identifies individuals likely to derive overall benefit or harm from DAPT extension. We sought to evaluate the impact of providing the DAPT score to treating physicians on the decision to extend DAPT beyond 1 year after non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Methods: Moderate to high-risk non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were enrolled from July 2016 to May 2018 in 13 Canadian hospitals by 52 cardiologists. Participating cardiologists were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive their individual patients’ DAPT scores before the 1-year follow-up visit vs not receiving their patients’ DAPT scores. Rates of DAPT extension were compared among the randomized groups. Results: At 1 year, 370 of the 585 (63.2%) patients discharged on DAPT were receiving DAPT. Among patients on DAPT at 1 year, the median (25th, 75th percentile) DAPT score was 2 (1,3). DAPT was extended beyond 1 year in 36.2% randomly assigned to provision of DAPT score vs 35.7% in the control group (P = 0.93). In the subgroup of patients with DAPT score ≥ 2, DAPT extension was 49.5% in the DAPT score provision arm vs 40.4% in the control arm (P = 0.22); among patients with DAPT score < 2, DAPT termination was 78.6% in the DAPT score provision arm vs 70.6% in the control arm (P = 0.26) (P value for interaction = 0.1). Conclusions: In this exploratory randomized trial, provision of the DAPT score to treating physicians had no impact on the duration of DAPT treatment beyond 1 year.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85121306339
U2 - 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.07.013
DO - 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.07.013
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34993458
AN - SCOPUS:85121306339
SN - 2589-790X
VL - 3
SP - 1463
EP - 1470
JO - CJC Open
JF - CJC Open
IS - 12
ER -