TY - JOUR
T1 - Prophylactic Topical Treatment for EGFR Inhibitor-Induced Papulopustular Rash
T2 - A Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Amitay-Laish, Iris
AU - Prag-Naveh, Hadas
AU - Ollech, Ayelet
AU - Davidovici, Batya
AU - Leshem, Yael Anne
AU - Snast, Igor
AU - Popovtzer, Aron
AU - Purim, Ofer
AU - Flex, Dov
AU - David, Michael
AU - Brenner, Baruch
AU - Ben-Aharon, Irit
AU - Peled, Nir
AU - Hodak, Emmillia
AU - Stemmer, Salomon M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 S. Karger AG. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/11/1
Y1 - 2021/11/1
N2 - Background: The incidence of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-induced papulopustular rash is 60-85%. Objective: To investigate prophylactic topical treatment for EGFRI-induced rash. Methods: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adult cancer patients initiating treatment with EGFRIs were randomized to receive facial topical treatment with chloramphenicol 3% + prednisolone 0.5% (CHL-PRED) ointment, chloramphenicol 3% (CHL) ointment, or aqua cream (AQUA). The primary end points were the incidence of ≥grade 3 rash using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), on days 14 and 30. A subanalysis was conducted for incidence of a protocol-specified significant rash, defined as ≥10 facial papulopustular lesions. Results: The per-protocol analysis on day 14 included 69 patients, who received CHL-PRED (21), CHL (23), or AQUA (25). The incidence of CTCAE ≥grade 3 rash was not statistically significant between arms; however, the incidence of the protocol-specified significant rash was: CHL-PRED 14%, CHL 39%, and AQUA 48% (p = 0.03, CHL-PRED vs. AQUA). At 30 days, the CTCAE ≥grade 3 incidence was similar, but the incidences of protocol-specified significant rash were 6%, 16%, and 43% (p = 0.03, CHL-PRED vs. AQUA). No significant differences were found between CHL and CHL-PRED and between CHL and AQUA. Conclusions: Prophylactic topical CHL-PRED was efficacious when compared to AQUA, in the treatment of EGFRI-induced facial papulopustular rash.
AB - Background: The incidence of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-induced papulopustular rash is 60-85%. Objective: To investigate prophylactic topical treatment for EGFRI-induced rash. Methods: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adult cancer patients initiating treatment with EGFRIs were randomized to receive facial topical treatment with chloramphenicol 3% + prednisolone 0.5% (CHL-PRED) ointment, chloramphenicol 3% (CHL) ointment, or aqua cream (AQUA). The primary end points were the incidence of ≥grade 3 rash using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), on days 14 and 30. A subanalysis was conducted for incidence of a protocol-specified significant rash, defined as ≥10 facial papulopustular lesions. Results: The per-protocol analysis on day 14 included 69 patients, who received CHL-PRED (21), CHL (23), or AQUA (25). The incidence of CTCAE ≥grade 3 rash was not statistically significant between arms; however, the incidence of the protocol-specified significant rash was: CHL-PRED 14%, CHL 39%, and AQUA 48% (p = 0.03, CHL-PRED vs. AQUA). At 30 days, the CTCAE ≥grade 3 incidence was similar, but the incidences of protocol-specified significant rash were 6%, 16%, and 43% (p = 0.03, CHL-PRED vs. AQUA). No significant differences were found between CHL and CHL-PRED and between CHL and AQUA. Conclusions: Prophylactic topical CHL-PRED was efficacious when compared to AQUA, in the treatment of EGFRI-induced facial papulopustular rash.
KW - Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor
KW - Papulopustular rash
KW - Topical treatment
KW - Trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099070304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000511869
DO - 10.1159/000511869
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 33378750
AN - SCOPUS:85099070304
SN - 1018-8665
VL - 237
SP - 988
EP - 994
JO - Dermatology
JF - Dermatology
IS - 6
ER -