Prophylactic antimicrobial treatment in transurethral prostatectomy How long should it be instituted?

B. Goldwasser*, A. A. Sidi, B. Bogokowsky, P. Jonas, O. Nativ, M. Many

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Eighty-one patients with proved preoperative sterile urine and undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate were studied. The patients were divided into 3 groups: group A received sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (ST) preoperatively and postoperatively for ten days; group B received ST in 2 divided doses, one pre- and one postoperatively; group C received no prophylaxis. In groups A and B, we found urinary infection in 3.8 per cent of patients compared with 32 per cent in group C. Performing prostatic chip cultures, we found that most urinary infections were unrelated to a prostatic source. When the prostate was infected, 75 per cent had infected urine postoperatively. We believe that prophylactic antimicrobial treatment should be given to all patients undergoing transurethral prostatectomy. However, it seems that immediate perooperative treatment suffices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)136-138
Number of pages3
JournalUrology
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1983

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prophylactic antimicrobial treatment in transurethral prostatectomy How long should it be instituted?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this