Promoting Reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation

Nurit Shnabel*, Arie Nadler, Johannes Ullrich, John F. Dovidio, Dganit Carmi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

211 Scopus citations

Abstract

Guided by the Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation, we hypothesized that being a member of a victimized group would be associated with a threat to the status and power of one's ingroup, whereas being a member of a perpetrating group would threaten the image of the ingroup as moral and socially acceptable. A social exchange interaction through which victims feel empowered by their perpetrators and perpetrators feel accepted by their victims was thus predicted to enhance the parties' willingness to reconcile. Supporting the predictions across two experiments, members of the perpetrator group (Jews in Study 1 and Germans in Study 2) showed greater willingness to reconcile when they received a message of acceptance, rather than empowerment, from a member of the victimized group. Members of the victimized group (Arabs in Study 1 and Jews in Study 2) demonstrated the opposite effect. Applied and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1021-1030
Number of pages10
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume35
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Keywords

  • Acceptance
  • Emotional needs
  • Empowerment
  • Intergroup reconciliation
  • Perpetrators
  • Victims

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Promoting Reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this