TY - JOUR
T1 - Promoting inclusive innovation for disabled people in four countries
T2 - who does what and why?
AU - Breznitz, Dan
AU - Zehavi, Amos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Disability policy is often characterized as comprising three different components: citizenship rights, labor market integration and social protection. In this study, we present a fourth component–disability-related innovation. Specifically we analyze two critical interrelated questions: what governments do to guide innovation in this area; and do patterns of greater government disability policy involvement in social-democratic welfare states apply in the case of innovation? Utilizing a qualitative comparison of Germany, Israel, Sweden and the United States, we find that while policy across all countries is at first glance decisively similar, the important differences that exist cannot be satisfactorily explained within the classical welfare state typology framework. Countries that are leaders in terms of social support for disabled people–Germany and Sweden–are not necessarily leaders in disability-related innovation. This is particularly noticeable in the case of programs for support of Assistive Technology development.
AB - Disability policy is often characterized as comprising three different components: citizenship rights, labor market integration and social protection. In this study, we present a fourth component–disability-related innovation. Specifically we analyze two critical interrelated questions: what governments do to guide innovation in this area; and do patterns of greater government disability policy involvement in social-democratic welfare states apply in the case of innovation? Utilizing a qualitative comparison of Germany, Israel, Sweden and the United States, we find that while policy across all countries is at first glance decisively similar, the important differences that exist cannot be satisfactorily explained within the classical welfare state typology framework. Countries that are leaders in terms of social support for disabled people–Germany and Sweden–are not necessarily leaders in disability-related innovation. This is particularly noticeable in the case of programs for support of Assistive Technology development.
KW - Assistive Technology development
KW - Disability policy
KW - Universal Design
KW - innovation policy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134629158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09687599.2022.2093698
DO - 10.1080/09687599.2022.2093698
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85134629158
SN - 0968-7599
JO - Disability and Society
JF - Disability and Society
ER -